China vs Kyrgyzstan

China vs Kyrgyzstan: Military spending in US dollars

Military spending in US dollars in 2025: $335B in China and $558M in Kyrgyzstan, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in China, by $334B, or 600 times that in Kyrgyzstan.

US dollars at 2024 prices · SIPRI

China vs Kyrgyzstan: Military spending in US dollarsMilitary spending in US dollars in 2025: $335B in China and $558M in Kyrgyzstan, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in China, by $334B, or 600 times that in Kyrgyzstan.
ChinaKyrgyzstanSIPRI estimate

What the numbers say

  • China has been higher in every year both have figures for since 1992.
  • In 2025, China ranked 2 and Kyrgyzstan ranked 99 of 151 countries, counting from the highest.

Every year

US dollars at 2024 prices · SIPRI

YearChinaKyrgyzstan
2025$335B$558M
2024$312B$511M
2023$292B$512M
2022$274B$396M
2021$263B$338M
2020$256B$338M
2019$244B$321M
2018$233B$315M
2017$220B$306M
2016$207B$305M
2015$196B$286M
2014$182B$277M
2013$168B$250M
2012$156B$234M
2011$141B$235M
2010$132B$239M
2009$125B$194M
2008$103B$177M
2007$94.4B$176M
2006$85.9B$161M
2005$74.6B$146M
2004$68B$132M
2003$61.7B$123M
2002$57B$108M
2001$49.6B$93.1M
2000$41.9B$108M
1999$38.7B$89.3M
1998$31.7B$85.3M
1997$29.1B$98.6M
1996$27.2B$89.1M
1995$25.7B$93.9M
1994$24.8B$75M
1993$25.7B$55.6M
1992$28B$97.8M
1991$23B–
1990$21.6B–
1989$19.9B–
  • Estimate

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • What the country spends on its armed forces and defence, in constant 2024 US dollars so that years compare, by SIPRI’s count.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 151 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

China vs Kyrgyzstan

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment