Myanmar (Burma) vs Russia

Myanmar (Burma) vs Russia: Armed forces, share of workers

Armed forces, share of workers in 2020: 1.94% of the labour force in Myanmar (Burma) and 1.98% of the labour force in Russia, by IISS estimates. In 2020 the value was higher in Russia, by 0.04 percentage points, or 1.02 times that in Myanmar (Burma).

% of the labour force · IISS

Myanmar (Burma) vs Russia: Armed forces, share of workersArmed forces, share of workers in 2020: 1.94% of the labour force in Myanmar (Burma) and 1.98% of the labour force in Russia, by IISS estimates. In 2020 the value was higher in Russia, by 0.04 percentage points, or 1.02 times that in Myanmar (Burma).
Myanmar (Burma)RussiaWorld

What the numbers say

  • Russia has been higher since 2020, when it overtook Myanmar (Burma).
  • In 2020, Myanmar (Burma) ranked 30 and Russia ranked 29 of 168 countries, counting from the highest.
  • The world as a whole: 0.79% of the labour force in 2020.

Every year

% of the labour force · IISS

YearMyanmar (Burma)RussiaWorld
20201.941.980.79
20192.161.970.79
20182.121.940.8
20172.151.940.8
20162.131.930.81
20152.111.980.82
20142.131.70.82
20132.161.660.83
20122.181.790.87
20112.211.790.88
20102.231.880.89
20092.251.970.89
20082.271.940.89
20072.291.960.89
20062.311.940.95
20052.21.960.96
20042.211.970.94
20032.761.880.98
20022.551.911
20012.111.921.01
20002.061.941.07
19992.12.021.09
19982.162.461.13
19972.172.621.15
19962.12.291.18
19951.952.511.2
19941.721.940.94
19931.762.030.98
19921.592.51.03
19911.62–1.03
19901.33–1.11

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • Active-duty military personnel as a share of everyone working or looking for work, by the IISS Military Balance.
  • Source: IISS, The Military Balance, via the World Bank.
  • Ranks count the 168 countries with a value in 2020, highest first.
  • The faint line is the world as a whole, as the same source counts it.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Myanmar (Burma) vs Russia

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment