Myanmar (Burma) vs South Korea

Myanmar (Burma) vs South Korea: Military share of state spending

Military share of state spending: 32% of government spending in Myanmar (Burma) in 2024 and 10.8% of government spending in South Korea in 2025, by SIPRI estimates. In 2024 the value was higher in Myanmar (Burma), by 20.7 percentage points, or 2.84 times that in South Korea.

% of government spending · SIPRI

Myanmar (Burma) vs South Korea: Military share of state spendingMilitary share of state spending: 32% of government spending in Myanmar (Burma) in 2024 and 10.8% of government spending in South Korea in 2025, by SIPRI estimates. In 2024 the value was higher in Myanmar (Burma), by 20.7 percentage points, or 2.84 times that in South Korea.
Myanmar (Burma)South KoreaSIPRI estimateHighly uncertain

What the numbers say

  • Myanmar (Burma) has been higher since 2020, when it overtook South Korea.

Every year

% of government spending · SIPRI

YearMyanmar (Burma)South Korea
2025–10.8
20243211.3
202317.411.2
202217.99.7
202121.110.9
202013.811.2
201910.811.9
201811.212.3
201717.512.3
201617.512.6
201517.812.6
201415.912.8
201317.912.6
201221.512.7
2011–13
2010–13.2
2009–12.8
2008–12.5
2007–12.1
2006–12.3
200511.912.6
200413.711.7
20031512.2
200210.113.7
200110.613.5
200011.214.4
19999.814.5
199810.516.4
1997–18.2
1996–18.5
1995–20.3
  • Estimate
  • Highly uncertain

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • The part of everything the government spends that goes on its armed forces and defence, by SIPRI’s count.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 150 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Myanmar (Burma) vs South Korea

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment