Myanmar (Burma) vs United Kingdom

Myanmar (Burma) vs United Kingdom: Military spending per person

Military spending per person: $92 in Myanmar (Burma) in 2024 and $1,283 in United Kingdom in 2025, by SIPRI estimates. In 2024 the value was higher in United Kingdom, by $1,211, or 14 times that in Myanmar (Burma).

US dollars per person · SIPRI

Myanmar (Burma) vs United Kingdom: Military spending per personMilitary spending per person: $92 in Myanmar (Burma) in 2024 and $1,283 in United Kingdom in 2025, by SIPRI estimates. In 2024 the value was higher in United Kingdom, by $1,211, or 14 times that in Myanmar (Burma).
Myanmar (Burma)United KingdomHighly uncertain

What the numbers say

  • United Kingdom has been higher in every year both have figures for since 1988.

Every year

US dollars per person · SIPRI

YearMyanmar (Burma)United Kingdom
2025–$1,283
2024$92$1,303
2023$46$1,075
2022$46$943
2021$50$966
2020$47$867
2019$29$845
2018$29$839
2017$43$787
2016$48$812
2015$50$921
2014$47$1,037
2013$47$995
2012$60$1,027
2011–$1,052
2010–$1,020
2009–$1,028
2008–$1,180
2007–$1,199
2006–$1,056
2005$697$1,021
2004$637$1,005
2003$521$877
2002$239$745
2001$208$668
2000$201$667
1999$156$694
1998$134$704
1997$110$683
1996$109$662
1995$93$659
1994$67$666
1993$50$659
1992$34$791
1991$24$819
1990$21$760
1989$14$656
1988$7$674
  • Highly uncertain

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • What the country spends on its armed forces and defence for each person living there, in US dollars of each year, not adjusted for inflation.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 151 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Myanmar (Burma) vs United Kingdom

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment