Pakistan vs United States

Pakistan vs United States: Military share of state spending

Military share of state spending in 2025: 13.8% of government spending in Pakistan and 8.3% of government spending in United States, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in Pakistan, by 5.6 percentage points, or 1.68 times that in United States.

% of government spending · SIPRI

Pakistan vs United States: Military share of state spendingMilitary share of state spending in 2025: 13.8% of government spending in Pakistan and 8.3% of government spending in United States, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in Pakistan, by 5.6 percentage points, or 1.68 times that in United States.
PakistanUnited StatesSIPRI estimate

What the numbers say

  • Pakistan has been higher in every year both have figures for since 2001.
  • In 2025, Pakistan ranked 17 and United States ranked 34 of 150 countries, counting from the highest.

Every year

% of government spending · SIPRI

YearPakistanUnited States
202513.88.3
2024149
2023158.7
202215.99
202118.47.9
202017.28.2
201918.49.5
201818.89.3
201717.69.4
201618.19.6
2015189.9
201417.310.4
201315.911.2
201216.112
20111712.4
201016.812.3
200916.911.8
200816.112
20071811.8
200621.412
200524.512.1
200426.112
200325.411.3
200222.610.3
2001249.6
200022.4–
199924–
199823.5–
199725–
199624.6–
199527.2–
199427.4–
199325.1–
  • Estimate

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • The part of everything the government spends that goes on its armed forces and defence, by SIPRI’s count.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 150 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Pakistan vs United States

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment