Philippines vs Tanzania

Philippines vs Tanzania: Military share of state spending

Military share of state spending in 2025: 5.4% of government spending in Philippines and 5.8% of government spending in Tanzania, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in Tanzania, by 0.4 percentage points, or 1.08 times that in Philippines.

% of government spending · SIPRI

Philippines vs Tanzania: Military share of state spendingMilitary share of state spending in 2025: 5.4% of government spending in Philippines and 5.8% of government spending in Tanzania, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in Tanzania, by 0.4 percentage points, or 1.08 times that in Philippines.
PhilippinesTanzaniaSIPRI estimate

What the numbers say

  • Tanzania has been higher since 2015, when it overtook Philippines.
  • In 2025, Philippines ranked 70 and Tanzania ranked 62 of 150 countries, counting from the highest.

Every year

% of government spending · SIPRI

YearPhilippinesTanzania
20255.45.8
20244.86.1
20234.86.5
20225.16.2
20215.26.1
202056.2
20195.26.1
20185.76.4
201766.4
20165.56.5
20156.16.4
20146.25.9
20136.95.2
20126.34.7
20116.74.7
20106.44.5
20096.33.9
200873.9
20077.14.3
20066.94.4
20056.84.4
20046.84.8
20037.35.8
20026.97.9
20016.89.7
20007.58.9
19997.58.6
19988.110.3
19978.39.9
199610.19.6
199510.58.6
19949.76.4
199310.86.9
19929.79.9
19919.812.7
199010–
198912.5–
  • Estimate

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • The part of everything the government spends that goes on its armed forces and defence, by SIPRI’s count.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 150 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Philippines vs Tanzania

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment