Singapore vs Tanzania

Singapore vs Tanzania: Military share of state spending

Military share of state spending in 2025: 18% of government spending in Singapore and 5.8% of government spending in Tanzania, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in Singapore, by 12.2 percentage points, or 3.1 times that in Tanzania.

% of government spending · SIPRI

Singapore vs Tanzania: Military share of state spendingMilitary share of state spending in 2025: 18% of government spending in Singapore and 5.8% of government spending in Tanzania, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in Singapore, by 12.2 percentage points, or 3.1 times that in Tanzania.
SingaporeTanzaniaSIPRI estimate

What the numbers say

  • Singapore has been higher in every year both have figures for since 1991.
  • In 2025, Singapore ranked 9 and Tanzania ranked 62 of 150 countries, counting from the highest.

Every year

% of government spending · SIPRI

YearSingaporeTanzania
2025185.8
2024196.1
202318.36.5
202215.86.2
202115.46.1
202011.46.2
201919.76.1
2018206.4
201721.66.4
201619.86.5
2015216.4
201423.95.9
201327.65.2
201231.44.7
201132.64.7
201032.24.5
200923.43.9
2008283.9
200739.24.3
200630.94.4
200533.74.4
200430.64.8
200330.15.8
200230.47.9
200126.59.7
200027.48.9
199931.88.6
199829.310.3
199730.49.9
199623.29.6
199529.48.6
1994336.4
199327.26.9
199229.79.9
199127.512.7
199029.9–
  • Estimate

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • The part of everything the government spends that goes on its armed forces and defence, by SIPRI’s count.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 150 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Singapore vs Tanzania

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment