Sweden vs Tajikistan

Sweden vs Tajikistan: GDP growth

GDP growth in 2025: 1.4% a year in Sweden and 8.4% a year in Tajikistan, by IMF estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in Tajikistan, by 7 percentage points, or 6.01 times that in Sweden.

% a year · IMF

Sweden vs Tajikistan: GDP growthGDP growth in 2025: 1.4% a year in Sweden and 8.4% a year in Tajikistan, by IMF estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in Tajikistan, by 7 percentage points, or 6.01 times that in Sweden.
SwedenTajikistanIMF projection (World Economic Outlook, October 2026)

What the numbers say

  • Tajikistan has been higher since 2000, when it overtook Sweden.
  • In 2025, Sweden ranked 114 and Tajikistan ranked 7 of 143 countries, counting from the highest.
  • The IMF projection (World Economic Outlook, October 2026) puts Sweden at 1.8% a year and Tajikistan at 5.5% a year in 2031.

Every year

% a year · IMF

YearSwedenTajikistan
20251.48.4
202428.4
2023-0.28.3
20221.38
20215.29.4
2020-1.94.4
20192.67.4
20181.87.6
20171.97.1
20162.16.9
20154.46
20142.36.7
20131.17.4
2012-0.47.5
20113.27.4
20105.86.5
2009-4.33.9
2008-0.97.9
20073.27.8
20064.77
20052.86.7
20044.210.6
20031.910.2
20022.39.1
20011.410.2
20004.68.3
19994.23.7
19984.25.3
19973.11.7
19961.7-4.4
19954.1-12.5
19944-21.4
1993-1.8-11.1
1992-1.1–
1991-1.1–
19900.5–
19892.6–
19882.5–
19873.4–
19863.1–
19852.3–
19844.3–
19832–
19821.4–
19814.5–
19804.6–
IMF projection (World Economic Outlook, October 2026) · 2026–2031
YearSwedenTajikistan
20262.57.3
20272.26.8
20282.16.2
20291.96
20301.85.5
20311.85.5

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • How much the economy grew or shrank in a year, after inflation.
  • Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook, October 2026.
  • The dashed line is the IMF projection (World Economic Outlook, October 2026), a scenario rather than a forecast.
  • Ranks count the 143 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Sweden vs Tajikistan

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment