Tanzania vs United States

Tanzania vs United States: Military share of state spending

Military share of state spending in 2025: 5.8% of government spending in Tanzania and 8.3% of government spending in United States, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in United States, by 2.4 percentage points, or 1.42 times that in Tanzania.

% of government spending · SIPRI

Tanzania vs United States: Military share of state spendingMilitary share of state spending in 2025: 5.8% of government spending in Tanzania and 8.3% of government spending in United States, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in United States, by 2.4 percentage points, or 1.42 times that in Tanzania.
TanzaniaUnited StatesSIPRI estimate

What the numbers say

  • United States has been higher since 2002, when it overtook Tanzania.
  • In 2025, Tanzania ranked 62 and United States ranked 34 of 150 countries, counting from the highest.

Every year

% of government spending · SIPRI

YearTanzaniaUnited States
20255.88.3
20246.19
20236.58.7
20226.29
20216.17.9
20206.28.2
20196.19.5
20186.49.3
20176.49.4
20166.59.6
20156.49.9
20145.910.4
20135.211.2
20124.712
20114.712.4
20104.512.3
20093.911.8
20083.912
20074.311.8
20064.412
20054.412.1
20044.812
20035.811.3
20027.910.3
20019.79.6
20008.9–
19998.6–
199810.3–
19979.9–
19969.6–
19958.6–
19946.4–
19936.9–
19929.9–
199112.7–
  • Estimate

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • The part of everything the government spends that goes on its armed forces and defence, by SIPRI’s count.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 150 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Tanzania vs United States

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment