丹麦与德国对比
丹麦与德国：武装部队人员
2020 年武装部队人员：丹麦为 15,000 人，德国为 183,000 人（据 IISS 估计）。 2020 年德国的数值较高，高出 168,000 人，是丹麦的 12 倍。
人 · IISS
数据解读
- 自 1985 年以来，在两国都有数据的每一年，德国的数值都更高。
- 全球整体：2020 年为 2740万 人。
逐年数据
人 · IISS
| 年份 | 丹麦 | 德国 | 世界 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 15,000 | 183,000 | 2740万 |
| 2019 | 15,000 | 184,000 | 2770万 |
| 2018 | 14,500 | 181,400 | 2770万 |
| 2017 | 15,000 | 180,000 | 2740万 |
| 2016 | 16,100 | 179,100 | 2750万 |
| 2015 | 16,600 | 177,300 | 2740万 |
| 2014 | 17,200 | 178,600 | 2730万 |
| 2013 | 17,200 | 181,600 | 2720万 |
| 2012 | 17,200 | 186,500 | 2820万 |
| 2011 | 16,450 | 196,000 | 2800万 |
| 2010 | 18,630 | 251,500 | 2810万 |
| 2009 | 18,710 | 251,500 | 2790万 |
| 2008 | 30,000 | 244,000 | 2750万 |
| 2007 | 30,000 | 244,000 | 2730万 |
| 2006 | 30,000 | 246,000 | 2700万 |
| 2005 | 21,000 | 285,000 | 2850万 |
| 2004 | 21,000 | 284,000 | 2710万 |
| 2003 | 22,800 | 284,500 | 2820万 |
| 2002 | 22,700 | 296,000 | 2830万 |
| 2001 | 21,400 | 308,400 | 2820万 |
| 2000 | 21,800 | 221,100 | 2940万 |
| 1999 | 27,000 | 331,000 | 2960万 |
| 1998 | 32,100 | 333,500 | 2990万 |
| 1997 | 32,900 | 347,100 | 2990万 |
| 1996 | 32,900 | 383,500 | 3020万 |
| 1995 | 33,100 | 365,000 | 3020万 |
| 1994 | 28,000 | 362,000 | 2320万 |
| 1993 | 27,000 | 398,000 | 2370万 |
| 1992 | 28,000 | 442,000 | 2450万 |
| 1991 | 30,000 | 457,000 | 2270万 |
| 1990 | 31,000 | 545,000 | 2390万 |
| 1989 | 31,000 | 503,000 | 2430万 |
| 1985 | 29,600 | 478,000 | 2220万 |
| 1984 | 31,000 | – | – |
| 1983 | 30,000 | – | – |
| 1982 | 32,000 | – | – |
| 1981 | 33,000 | – | – |
| 1980 | 33,000 | – | – |
| 1979 | 33,000 | – | – |
| 1978 | 33,000 | – | – |
| 1977 | 32,000 | – | – |
| 1976 | 31,000 | – | – |
| 1975 | 34,000 | – | – |
| 1974 | 35,000 | – | – |
| 1973 | 39,000 | – | – |
| 1972 | 45,000 | – | – |
| 1971 | 45,000 | – | – |
| 1970 | 45,000 | – | – |
| 1969 | 45,000 | – | – |
| 1968 | 45,000 | – | – |
| 1967 | 50,000 | – | – |
| 1966 | 50,000 | – | – |
| 1965 | 50,000 | – | – |
| 1964 | 45,000 | – | – |
| 1963 | 45,000 | – | – |
| 1962 | 47,000 | – | – |
| 1961 | 45,000 | – | – |
| 1960 | 32,000 | – | – |
| 1959 | 32,000 | – | – |
| 1958 | 32,000 | – | – |
| 1957 | 35,000 | – | – |
| 1956 | 35,000 | – | – |
| 1955 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1954 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1953 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1952 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1951 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1950 | 18,000 | – | – |
| 1949 | 16,000 | – | – |
| 1948 | 14,000 | – | – |
| 1947 | 14,000 | – | – |
| 1946 | 14,000 | – | – |
| 1945 | 13,000 | 530万 | – |
| 1944 | – | 613万 | – |
| 1943 | – | 696万 | – |
| 1942 | – | 703万 | – |
| 1941 | – | 710万 | – |
| 1940 | 13,000 | 330万 | – |
| 1939 | 12,000 | 275万 | – |
| 1938 | 11,000 | 782,000 | – |
| 1937 | 12,000 | 603,000 | – |
| 1936 | 12,000 | 596,000 | – |
| 1935 | 10,000 | 461,000 | – |
| 1934 | 10,000 | 315,000 | – |
| 1933 | 11,000 | 118,000 | – |
| 1932 | 11,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1931 | 11,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1930 | 11,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1929 | 12,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1928 | 14,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1927 | 13,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1926 | 14,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1925 | 14,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1924 | 14,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1923 | 13,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1922 | 13,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1921 | 15,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1920 | 16,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1919 | 16,000 | 114,000 | – |
| 1918 | 16,000 | 800万 | – |
| 1917 | 16,000 | 538万 | – |
| 1916 | 16,000 | 458万 | – |
| 1915 | 15,000 | 382万 | – |
| 1914 | 15,000 | 862,000 | – |
| 1913 | 15,000 | 859,000 | – |
| 1912 | 15,000 | 716,000 | – |
| 1911 | 15,000 | 677,000 | – |
| 1910 | 15,000 | 673,000 | – |
| 1909 | 15,000 | 667,000 | – |
| 1908 | 12,000 | 663,000 | – |
| 1907 | 11,000 | 658,000 | – |
| 1906 | 11,000 | 653,000 | – |
| 1905 | 11,000 | 648,000 | – |
| 1904 | 11,000 | 642,000 | – |
| 1903 | 11,000 | 636,000 | – |
| 1902 | 11,000 | 638,000 | – |
| 1901 | 11,000 | 630,000 | – |
| 1900 | 11,000 | 624,000 | – |
| 1899 | 12,000 | 619,000 | – |
| 1898 | 12,000 | 606,000 | – |
| 1897 | 16,000 | 604,000 | – |
| 1896 | 12,000 | 602,000 | – |
| 1895 | 12,000 | 602,000 | – |
| 1894 | 15,000 | 601,000 | – |
| 1893 | 15,000 | 601,000 | – |
| 1892 | 15,000 | 526,000 | – |
| 1891 | 17,000 | 524,000 | – |
| 1890 | 18,000 | 505,000 | – |
| 1889 | 18,000 | 504,000 | – |
| 1888 | 17,000 | 504,000 | – |
| 1887 | 14,000 | 503,000 | – |
| 1886 | 11,000 | 460,000 | – |
| 1885 | 8,000 | 459,000 | – |
| 1884 | 6,000 | 457,000 | – |
| 1883 | 6,000 | 457,000 | – |
| 1882 | 6,000 | 455,000 | – |
| 1881 | 6,000 | 456,000 | – |
| 1880 | 6,000 | 430,000 | – |
| 1879 | 6,000 | 430,000 | – |
| 1878 | 11,000 | 429,000 | – |
| 1877 | 16,000 | 429,000 | – |
| 1876 | 16,000 | 429,000 | – |
| 1875 | 16,000 | 428,000 | – |
| 1874 | 39,000 | 429,000 | – |
| 1873 | 39,000 | 426,000 | – |
| 1872 | 39,000 | 427,000 | – |
| 1871 | 38,000 | – | – |
| 1870 | 39,000 | – | – |
| 1869 | 39,000 | – | – |
| 1868 | 51,000 | – | – |
| 1867 | 46,000 | – | – |
| 1866 | 43,000 | – | – |
| 1865 | 38,000 | – | – |
| 1864 | 32,000 | – | – |
| 1863 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1862 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1861 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1860 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1859 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1858 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1857 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1856 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1855 | 25,000 | – | – |
| 1854 | 26,000 | – | – |
| 1853 | 26,000 | – | – |
| 1852 | 26,000 | – | – |
| 1851 | 26,000 | – | – |
| 1850 | 26,000 | – | – |
| 1849 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1848 | 27,000 | – | – |
| 1847 | 27,000 | – | – |
| 1846 | 27,000 | – | – |
| 1845 | 26,000 | – | – |
| 1844 | 24,000 | – | – |
| 1843 | 23,000 | – | – |
| 1842 | 31,000 | – | – |
| 1841 | 38,000 | – | – |
| 1840 | 45,000 | – | – |
| 1839 | 35,000 | – | – |
| 1838 | 37,000 | – | – |
| 1837 | 39,000 | – | – |
| 1836 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1835 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1834 | 33,000 | – | – |
| 1833 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1832 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1831 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1830 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1829 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1828 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1827 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1826 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1825 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1824 | 41,000 | – | – |
| 1823 | 30,000 | – | – |
| 1822 | 28,000 | – | – |
| 1821 | 26,000 | – | – |
| 1820 | 28,000 | – | – |
| 1819 | 29,000 | – | – |
| 1818 | 30,000 | – | – |
| 1817 | 31,000 | – | – |
| 1816 | 32,000 | – | – |
- 12.3Correlates of War 估计值
分别查看各国
须知
- 现役军人，并包括按军人标准训练和装备的准军事部队，依据 IISS《The Military Balance》。
- 来源：IISS, The Military Balance, via the World Bank。
- 1985 年以前：Correlates of War Project, National Material Capabilities v7.0; Singer, Bremer and Stuckey (1972), “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965”, in Bruce Russett (ed.), Peace, War, and Numbers, Sage, 19–48。
- 排名基于 2020 年有数值的 170 个国家，从高到低排列。
- 浅色线为同一来源统计的全球整体数值。
各图层如何运作、数据从何而来，以及它们无法告诉你什么： 历年各国数据
丹麦与德国对比
健康
人口与社会
经济
教育
政治
冲突
军用
- 军费开支丹麦：2025 年为 GDP 的 3.25%德国：2025 年为 GDP 的 2.27%
- 军费开支（美元）丹麦：2025 年为 US$141亿德国：2025 年为 US$1070亿
- 人均军费开支丹麦：2025 年为 US$2,495德国：2025 年为 US$1,346
- 军费占政府支出比例丹麦：2025 年为 6.6%（占政府支出）德国：2025 年为 4.5%（占政府支出）
- 国家实力丹麦：2022 年为 0.09%（占全球实力）德国：2022 年为 1.5%（占全球实力）
- 武装部队占劳动力比例丹麦：2020 年为 0.49%（占劳动力）德国：2020 年为 0.42%（占劳动力）
- 武器进口丹麦：2025 年为 2.78亿 TIV德国：2025 年为 16.3亿 TIV
- 武器出口丹麦：2025 年为 1.65亿 TIV德国：2025 年为 17亿 TIV