Australia vs Myanmar (Burma)

Australia vs Myanmar (Burma): Military share of state spending

Military share of state spending: 4.9% of government spending in Australia in 2025 and 32% of government spending in Myanmar (Burma) in 2024, by SIPRI estimates. In 2024 the value was higher in Myanmar (Burma), by 27.1 percentage points, or 6.53 times that in Australia.

% of government spending · SIPRI

Australia vs Myanmar (Burma): Military share of state spendingMilitary share of state spending: 4.9% of government spending in Australia in 2025 and 32% of government spending in Myanmar (Burma) in 2024, by SIPRI estimates. In 2024 the value was higher in Myanmar (Burma), by 27.1 percentage points, or 6.53 times that in Australia.
AustraliaMyanmar (Burma)SIPRI estimateHighly uncertain

What the numbers say

  • Myanmar (Burma) has been higher in every year both have figures for since 1998.

Every year

% of government spending · SIPRI

YearAustraliaMyanmar (Burma)
20254.9–
20244.932
2023517.4
2022517.9
20214.721.1
20204.513.8
20194.810.8
20185.111.2
20175.517.5
20165.617.5
20155.217.8
20144.815.9
20134.517.9
20124.621.5
20114.8–
20105–
20095.1–
20085.1–
20075.3–
20065.3–
20055.211.9
20045.213.7
20035.315
20025.410.1
20015.210.6
20005.211.2
19995.29.8
19985.410.5
19975.7–
19965.8–
19956–
19946.3–
19936.4–
19926.4–
19916.5–
19906.8–
19896.9–
19887–
  • Estimate
  • Highly uncertain

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • The part of everything the government spends that goes on its armed forces and defence, by SIPRI’s count.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 150 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Australia vs Myanmar (Burma)

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment