China vs South Korea

China vs South Korea: Military share of state spending

Military share of state spending in 2025: 5.1% of government spending in China and 10.8% of government spending in South Korea, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in South Korea, by 5.7 percentage points, or 2.11 times that in China.

% of government spending · SIPRI

China vs South Korea: Military share of state spendingMilitary share of state spending in 2025: 5.1% of government spending in China and 10.8% of government spending in South Korea, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in South Korea, by 5.7 percentage points, or 2.11 times that in China.
ChinaSouth KoreaSIPRI estimate

What the numbers say

  • South Korea has been higher in every year both have figures for since 1995.
  • In 2025, China ranked 75 and South Korea ranked 24 of 150 countries, counting from the highest.

Every year

% of government spending · SIPRI

YearChinaSouth Korea
20255.110.8
20245.111.3
2023511.2
20224.99.7
20214.910.9
20204.911.2
20194.911.9
2018512.3
20175.312.3
20165.512.6
20155.612.6
2014612.8
2013612.6
2012612.7
20116.213
2010713.2
20097.412.8
20087.612.5
20079.612.1
200610.212.3
200510.212.6
200410.911.7
20031112.2
200211.213.7
200111.413.5
200011.314.4
199912.514.5
199813.116.4
199714.118.2
19961518.5
199515.220.3
199414.1–
199314.8–
199216.9–
199114.3–
199013.8–
198913.2–
  • Estimate

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • The part of everything the government spends that goes on its armed forces and defence, by SIPRI’s count.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 150 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

China vs South Korea

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment