China vs Tajikistan

China vs Tajikistan: Military spending in US dollars

Military spending in US dollars in 2025: $335B in China and $220M in Tajikistan, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in China, by $335B, or 1,500 times that in Tajikistan.

US dollars at 2024 prices · SIPRI

China vs Tajikistan: Military spending in US dollarsMilitary spending in US dollars in 2025: $335B in China and $220M in Tajikistan, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in China, by $335B, or 1,500 times that in Tajikistan.
ChinaTajikistanSIPRI estimate

What the numbers say

  • China has been higher in every year both have figures for since 1992.
  • In 2025, China ranked 2 and Tajikistan ranked 115 of 151 countries, counting from the highest.

Every year

US dollars at 2024 prices · SIPRI

YearChinaTajikistan
2025$335B$220M
2024$312B$184M
2023$292B$296M
2022$274B$222M
2021$263B$107M
2020$256B$91.9M
2019$244B$98.9M
2018$233B$101M
2017$220B$93.8M
2016$207B$99.7M
2015$196B$99M
2014$182B$86.8M
2013$168B–
2012$156B$67.9M
2011$141B$65.4M
2010$132B$52.6M
2009$125B$46.9M
2008$103B$45.6M
2007$94.4B–
2006$85.9B–
2005$74.6B–
2004$68B$54.6M
2003$61.7B$46.5M
2002$57B$35.9M
2001$49.6B$16.9M
2000$41.9B$17M
1999$38.7B$19.7M
1998$31.7B$23.5M
1997$29.1B$20.5M
1996$27.2B$14.3M
1995$25.7B$13.3M
1994$24.8B$46.2M
1993$25.7B$146M
1992$28B$40.9M
1991$23B–
1990$21.6B–
1989$19.9B–
  • Estimate

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • What the country spends on its armed forces and defence, in constant 2024 US dollars so that years compare, by SIPRI’s count.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 151 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

China vs Tajikistan

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment