Myanmar (Burma) vs Singapore

Myanmar (Burma) vs Singapore: Government debt

Government debt: 37.6% of GDP in Myanmar (Burma) in 2019 and 165.8% of GDP in Singapore in 2024, by IMF estimates. In 2019 the value was higher in Singapore, by 90.1 percentage points, or 3.39 times that in Myanmar (Burma).

% of GDP · IMF

Myanmar (Burma) vs Singapore: Government debtGovernment debt: 37.6% of GDP in Myanmar (Burma) in 2019 and 165.8% of GDP in Singapore in 2024, by IMF estimates. In 2019 the value was higher in Singapore, by 90.1 percentage points, or 3.39 times that in Myanmar (Burma).
Myanmar (Burma)SingaporeIMF projection (World Economic Outlook, October 2026)

What the numbers say

  • Singapore has been higher since 2007, when it overtook Myanmar (Burma).
  • The IMF projection (World Economic Outlook, October 2026) puts Myanmar (Burma) at 56% of GDP and Singapore at 169.2% of GDP in 2031.

Every year

% of GDP · IMF

YearMyanmar (Burma)Singapore
202450.7165.8
202353.2170.4
202256153.3
202163.4139.9
202049.1147.1
201937.6127.7
201839.9109.2
201741.9107.3
201635.7105.9
201536.6102.1
201434.597.8
201344.998.2
201248106.7
201149.9103.1
201054.498.7
200956.4101.7
200859.897.9
200777.487.8
2006103.186.5
200511992.7
2004126.695.7
200314699.1
2002190.696.3
200126294.5
2000164.582.3
1999150.785.3
1998208.684.7
1997–70.8
1996–71.3
1995–69.8
1994–70.7
1993–71.2
1992–79
1991–76.4
1990–73.5
  • 12.3Projected
IMF projection (World Economic Outlook, October 2026) · 2025–2031
YearMyanmar (Burma)Singapore
202552165.7
202653.3166.4
202754.6167.1
202855.3167.9
202955.3168.5
203055.7169
203156169.2

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • What the government owes, as a share of the economy’s yearly output.
  • Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook, October 2026.
  • The dashed line is the IMF projection (World Economic Outlook, October 2026), a scenario rather than a forecast.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Myanmar (Burma) vs Singapore

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment