Tajikistan vs United Kingdom

Tajikistan vs United Kingdom: Military spending per person

Military spending per person in 2025: $23 in Tajikistan and $1,283 in United Kingdom, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in United Kingdom, by $1,260, or 56 times that in Tajikistan.

US dollars per person · SIPRI

Tajikistan vs United Kingdom: Military spending per personMilitary spending per person in 2025: $23 in Tajikistan and $1,283 in United Kingdom, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in United Kingdom, by $1,260, or 56 times that in Tajikistan.
TajikistanUnited KingdomSIPRI estimate

What the numbers say

  • United Kingdom has been higher in every year both have figures for since 1992.
  • In 2025, Tajikistan ranked 117 and United Kingdom ranked 15 of 151 countries, counting from the highest.

Every year

US dollars per person · SIPRI

YearTajikistanUnited Kingdom
2025$23$1,283
2024$18$1,303
2023$28$1,075
2022$20$943
2021$9$966
2020$8$867
2019$9$845
2018$9$839
2017$9$787
2016$10$812
2015$12$921
2014$13$1,037
2013–$995
2012$10$1,027
2011$9$1,052
2010$7$1,020
2009$6$1,028
2008$7$1,180
2007–$1,199
2006–$1,056
2005–$1,021
2004$7$1,005
2003$5$877
2002$4$745
2001$2$668
2000$2$667
1999$2$694
1998$4$704
1997$3$683
1996$2$662
1995$1$659
1994$2$666
1993$4$659
1992$0$791
1991–$819
1990–$760
1989–$656
1988–$674
  • Estimate

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • What the country spends on its armed forces and defence for each person living there, in US dollars of each year, not adjusted for inflation.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 151 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Tajikistan vs United Kingdom

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment