China vs United Kingdom

China vs United Kingdom: Military share of state spending

Military share of state spending in 2025: 5.1% of government spending in China and 5.4% of government spending in United Kingdom, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in United Kingdom, by 0.3 percentage points, or 1.06 times that in China.

% of government spending · SIPRI

China vs United Kingdom: Military share of state spendingMilitary share of state spending in 2025: 5.1% of government spending in China and 5.4% of government spending in United Kingdom, by SIPRI estimates. In 2025 the value was higher in United Kingdom, by 0.3 percentage points, or 1.06 times that in China.
ChinaUnited KingdomSIPRI estimate

What the numbers say

  • United Kingdom has been higher since 2024, when it overtook China.
  • In 2025, China ranked 75 and United Kingdom ranked 69 of 150 countries, counting from the highest.

Every year

% of government spending · SIPRI

YearChinaUnited Kingdom
20255.15.4
20245.15.6
202354.9
20224.94.7
20214.94.5
20204.94.3
20194.95.1
201855
20175.35
20165.55
20155.65.1
201465.3
201365.5
201265.6
20116.25.7
201075.8
20097.45.9
20087.66.1
20079.66.2
200610.26.2
200510.26.3
200410.96.5
2003116.8
200211.26.9
200111.46.9
200011.37
199912.57.1
199813.17.2
199714.17.3
1996157.6
199515.27.6
199414.18.3
199314.88.7
199216.99.4
199114.310.5
199013.810.4
198913.211
1988–11.3
  • Estimate

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • The part of everything the government spends that goes on its armed forces and defence, by SIPRI’s count.
  • Source: Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure Database, https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685.
  • Marked points are SIPRI’s own: a dot where it gives the figure as its estimate, a ring where it calls the figure highly uncertain.
  • Ranks count the 150 countries with a value in 2025, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

China vs United Kingdom

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment