Kyrgyzstan vs Tajikistan

Kyrgyzstan vs Tajikistan: Armed forces, share of workers

Armed forces, share of workers in 2020: 0.81% of the labour force in Kyrgyzstan and 0.75% of the labour force in Tajikistan, by IISS estimates. In 2020 the value was higher in Kyrgyzstan, by 0.07 percentage points, or 1.09 times that in Tajikistan.

% of the labour force · IISS

Kyrgyzstan vs Tajikistan: Armed forces, share of workersArmed forces, share of workers in 2020: 0.81% of the labour force in Kyrgyzstan and 0.75% of the labour force in Tajikistan, by IISS estimates. In 2020 the value was higher in Kyrgyzstan, by 0.07 percentage points, or 1.09 times that in Tajikistan.
KyrgyzstanTajikistanWorld

What the numbers say

  • Kyrgyzstan has been higher since 1997, when it overtook Tajikistan.
  • In 2020, Kyrgyzstan ranked 86 and Tajikistan ranked 91 of 168 countries, counting from the highest.
  • The world as a whole: 0.79% of the labour force in 2020.

Every year

% of the labour force · IISS

YearKyrgyzstanTajikistanWorld
20200.810.750.79
20190.80.750.79
20180.820.750.8
20170.860.750.8
20160.820.730.81
20150.830.740.82
20140.850.750.82
20130.880.760.83
20120.850.780.87
20110.840.790.88
20100.860.80.89
20090.880.810.89
20080.910.830.89
20070.910.810.89
20060.910.80.95
20050.790.60.96
20040.770.550.94
20030.720.330.98
20020.730.341
20010.650.351.01
20000.660.361.07
19990.580.521.09
19980.690.531.13
19970.710.541.15
19960.61.281.18
19950.3511.2
19940.670.170.94
19930.650.170.98
19920.680.171.03
1991––1.03
1990––1.11

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • Active-duty military personnel as a share of everyone working or looking for work, by the IISS Military Balance.
  • Source: IISS, The Military Balance, via the World Bank.
  • Ranks count the 168 countries with a value in 2020, highest first.
  • The faint line is the world as a whole, as the same source counts it.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Kyrgyzstan vs Tajikistan

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment