Kyrgyzstan vs Tajikistan

Kyrgyzstan vs Tajikistan: National power

National power in 2022: 0.04% of world capability in Kyrgyzstan and 0.05% of world capability in Tajikistan, by Correlates of War estimates. In 2022 the value was higher in Tajikistan, by 0 percentage points, or 1.1 times that in Kyrgyzstan.

% of world capability · Correlates of War

Kyrgyzstan vs Tajikistan: National powerNational power in 2022: 0.04% of world capability in Kyrgyzstan and 0.05% of world capability in Tajikistan, by Correlates of War estimates. In 2022 the value was higher in Tajikistan, by 0 percentage points, or 1.1 times that in Kyrgyzstan.
KyrgyzstanTajikistan

What the numbers say

  • Tajikistan has been higher since 2005, when it overtook Kyrgyzstan.
  • In 2022, Kyrgyzstan ranked 124 and Tajikistan ranked 120 of 195 countries, counting from the highest.

Every year

% of world capability · Correlates of War

YearKyrgyzstanTajikistan
20220.040.05
20210.040.05
20200.040.05
20190.040.05
20180.040.05
20170.040.05
20160.040.04
20150.030.04
20140.030.04
20130.030.04
20120.030.04
20110.030.04
20100.030.04
20090.030.04
20080.030.04
20070.040.04
20060.040.04
20050.040.04
20040.040.04
20030.040.04
20020.040.04
20010.040.04
20000.040.04
19990.030.04
19980.040.04
19970.040.04
19960.040.04
19950.040.04
19940.040.04
19930.040.04
19920.040.04
19910.050.06

Each country on its own

Good to know

  • The Correlates of War’s Composite Index of National Capability: the country’s share of the world’s military spending, soldiers, iron and steel, energy use, people and city dwellers, averaged.
  • Source: Correlates of War Project, National Material Capabilities v7.0; Singer, Bremer and Stuckey (1972), “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965”, in Bruce Russett (ed.), Peace, War, and Numbers, Sage, 19–48.
  • Ranks count the 195 countries with a value in 2022, highest first.

How the layers work, where their data comes from and what they can’t tell you: Countries through time

Kyrgyzstan vs Tajikistan

Health

People

Economy

Education

Politics

Conflict

Military

Climate

Technology and environment